DID YOU KNOW ENERGY DOES NOT EXIST WITH OUT MASS? MASS DOES NOT EXIST WITHOUT ENERGY.
SPACE DOES NOT EXIST WITHOUT REFERENCE POINTS. REFERENCE POINTS REQUIRE SPACE.
THERE IS NO MAGENTISM WITHOUT BOTH ENERGY AND MASS. ELECTRO MAGNETISM IS A COUPLED RELATIONSHIP.
PHOTONS ARE UNDETECTABLE WITHOUT MASS AND MASS IS ONLY ACERTAINABLE WITH PHOTONS AS CODE.
THATS THE COUPLED UNIVERSE WE LIVE IN.
WHAT IT MEANS IS THE PROPERTIES OF EXISTENCE REQUIRE THE CONFULENCE OF BOTH X AND Y OR E AND F. Concepts of pure energy are nonsense. The idea that mater and space have a dimension in time is equivalent to what ever energy is.
Then came my discovery that all energy is a manifestation of existing energy of motion relative to everything else in relative motion. Where do I go with the theory then? Einstein was interested in saying that all mater is convertible to energy or is energy and all energy is a manifestation of mater. My thesis is more Newtonian. except that there are no objects at rest. All are in relative motion. When I look out at the night sky and see stars and galaxies all around I see them all as manifestations of collisions happening even all those fusion power plant analogy stars. Because the energy utilized is just coming from taking it out of a reservoir of forward momentum in all circumstances. What I see illuminated in the sky is all coupled energy and mass relationships.
SPACE DOES NOT EXIST WITHOUT REFERENCE POINTS. REFERENCE POINTS REQUIRE SPACE.
THERE IS NO MAGENTISM WITHOUT BOTH ENERGY AND MASS. ELECTRO MAGNETISM IS A COUPLED RELATIONSHIP.
PHOTONS ARE UNDETECTABLE WITHOUT MASS AND MASS IS ONLY ACERTAINABLE WITH PHOTONS AS CODE.
THATS THE COUPLED UNIVERSE WE LIVE IN.
WHAT IT MEANS IS THE PROPERTIES OF EXISTENCE REQUIRE THE CONFULENCE OF BOTH X AND Y OR E AND F. Concepts of pure energy are nonsense. The idea that mater and space have a dimension in time is equivalent to what ever energy is.
Then came my discovery that all energy is a manifestation of existing energy of motion relative to everything else in relative motion. Where do I go with the theory then? Einstein was interested in saying that all mater is convertible to energy or is energy and all energy is a manifestation of mater. My thesis is more Newtonian. except that there are no objects at rest. All are in relative motion. When I look out at the night sky and see stars and galaxies all around I see them all as manifestations of collisions happening even all those fusion power plant analogy stars. Because the energy utilized is just coming from taking it out of a reservoir of forward momentum in all circumstances. What I see illuminated in the sky is all coupled energy and mass relationships.
Comments
Post a Comment